Johnson Water Fountain: Our campaign for it’s return to the town centre

Johnson Water Fountain: Our campaign for it's return to the town centre

Johnson Fountain in Hall Place
Hikiah Burgess 1822 engraving showing the water pump in Market Place
Market Place lamp post and later water pump
Location of well marker in Hall Place
Location of Market Place Well Marker - closer view
Market Place Well Marker

Early hope

In 2018, we thought that the only controversy would be a debate as to where it was going to go.

The general consensus seemed to be strongly in favour of somewhere in the town centre. After all, that’s where  it  was  designed  for  –  originally  in the Market Place, then revised to Hall Place. As well as providing pure drinking water at a time when it was a luxury for many people in the town, it strengthened the distinctive character of Hall Place by giving it a striking central focus. That is, until it was removed to Ayscoughfee Gardens in 1954 to make way for a traffic scheme.

We expected that a recommendation on the fountain’s re-siting would figure in a wider review of the town centre. This was to be carried out by a working group which Policy 25 of the South East Lincolnshire Local Plan  required to be set up to support the enhancement of the town centre.

South Holland District Chairman Rodney Grocock spoke warmly of wishing to see the fountain back in the centre. At the District Council’s AGM in May 2018 he said: 

It is my ambition to seek to reinstate the Drinking Fountain within Spalding town centre. I am, however, keen to ensure that this happens in conjunction with a wider consideration of town centre improvements. I am also unsure that reinstatement within Hall Place is necessarily the most appropriate location given the changes that have  taken  place to the town  over  the  past  century and more.

After referring to Policy 25, he went on:

I would hope the councillors would support me in proposing that officers embrace the opportunity, when implementing this new policy and considering the public realm within Spalding, to reintroduce the Drinking Fountain to a prime location in the heart of the town centre.” (Council AGM Minutes, 16 May 2018.)

Councillor Grocock was offered the Society’s warmest support.

In time, as expected the working group was set up.  As we had been invited to join the group, we naturally assumed that we would be included in those discussions and our Chair set about exploring funding options and making tentative enquiries, albeit somewhat hindered by the first Covid lockdown.

Out of the Blue

At the beginning of 2021, we along many in the town were shocked to read in the Spalding Voice that the the Cemetery Improvement Group had suggested that the Fountain be installed in the Cemetery. There could hardly be a more unsuitable place. In a cemetery it was bound to be perceived as the memorial of somebody-or-other who died and was buried there. 

On the contrary, it was a monument of gratitude to someone who was very much alive in 1874 – Miss Mary Anne Johnson – for the gift of life that she had brought to thousands of ordinary Spalding people. Her £150,000 (in modern money) enabled water mains to be laid along the three or four principle Spalding roads, bringing pure drinking water to whole areas of the town previously dependent on more or less contaminated well water, with the often fatal illnesses that resulted.

The Fountain was designed for the Market Place (with a last minute change to Hall Place); and Spalding lost a distinctive part of its character when it was dismantled to make way for an experimental traffic scheme in 1954. To restore it to the centre would be to restore some of that lost character. And it is of course a ready-made feature for the regeneration of the town centre, to which SHDC had pledged to undertake.

A follow-up letter to The Spalding Voice making these points set social media buzzing – overwhelmingly in favour of the town centre. Spalding people, it seems, clearly wanted to see the Fountain back again in a place in the town where it has meaning. It is an emblem of life, not death.

Things went silent, but at the Spalding Town Forum meeting in September 2021, our Chair formally requested that the Society be involved in the discussions as to where the Fountain should go. (item 6)

Promises broken

At the beginning of 2022, it was reported that the Fountain was to be restored and returned to Ayscoughfee Gardens – It was claimed that it was not feasible to return it to Hall Place  but gave no indication whether any other town centre location had been considered.  We therefore lodged a Freedom of Information Request to the District Council asking for copies of copies of all minutes of meetings, notes of telephone calls, written communications and emails together with any supporting documentary expert evidence that may have been obtained leading up to the conclusion that it could only be sited in Ayscoughfee Hall.  That was on 21 January 2022. No response.  However, we were invited to a meeting in March 2022 just before the planning application to return the Fountain to Ayscoughfee Gardens was lodged on 4 April 2022, and were told that we would be provided with a copy of the report on which the decision was made together with notes of a meeting that had been held with Historic England and that we would also receive a response to the Freedom of Information Request. We were provided with a copy of the report and notes of the meeting held with Historic England and were advised that the planning application would be withdrawn to allow us time to consider both documents. What seemed apparent from the documentation, though was that the Council had only considered two sites. Hall Place and Ayscoughfee Gardens.  

Public campaign

It became quite clear that a considerable element of the public were opposed to the idea of the Fountain being returned to Ayscoughfee Hall from the comments on social media that appeared after the announcement in January.  As we recognised that not everyone uses social media, we decided to launch an online petition which the press kindly publicised as we wanted to get a wider sample of views. This was backed up by a street campaign stall at which paper versions of our petition were made available.  Hundreds of people signed our petition and when we undertook our street survey, a whopping 96% who expressed a preference wanted the fountain restored to the Town Centre.  

Publicity

The local press gave us a lot of coverage and also supported our campaign by promoting our petition.

Local Residents also contacted the press to support our campaign:-

  • West Pinchbeck resident calls for Johnson Drinking Fountain to be returned to Spalding town centre to ‘make it lovely’ again Lincsonline 4 October 2022

Heritage Impact Assessment assessed

We notified the Council on 26 May 2022 of significant factual errors in the first Heritage Impact Assessment that had been prepared to accompany the original planning application in March 2022. 

Whilst an updated Heritage Impact Assessment was prepared in July 2022 that took on board our concerns about the factual inaccuracies in the original Assessment, our concerns about the process and lack of meaningful engagement and a proper assessment of all possible options for the fountain remained unaddressed.

In the Autumn of 2021, members of the Heritage sub-group of the Town Centre Regeneration Steering Group had endorsed  a report that stated:-

“An “eye-catcher” artwork or feature such as the Johnson Memorial Fountain at the end of Bridge Street could draw people towards the river. Perhaps with landscaping?”

Whilst other sites suggested by members of the public included:-

  • Market Place
  • The Sheep Market
  • Swan Walk
  • Bridge Street
We suspected from the Heritage Impact Assessment that only two sites had ever been considered. Ayscoughfee Hall and Hall Place.  We hoped that responses to our Freedom of Information request made in January 2022 would help us establish whether any other sites had been considered in any way. 

Freedom of Information Request

As we wanted to understand why the Council had decided to return the Johnson Fountain to Ayscoughfee Gardens we lodged a Freedom of Information request to the District Council in January 2022, requesting in electronic form copies of all minutes of meetings, notes of telephone calls, written communications and emails together with any supporting documentary expert evidence that may have been obtained that led to the announcement that the Johnson Water Fountain is to be re-erected in Ayscoughfee Gardens. We did not receive a response until April 2022. This stated that they were unable to respond as the time to respond would take more than the permitted time stating that they did not have the technical infrastructure in place to undertake searches of emails. This response was unsatisfactory and we referred the Council to the Code of Practice  issued to public authorities covering the management of records issued on the Freedom of Information Act and the requirement to provide advice and assistance to help an applicant to make a fresh request that the authority can deal with.  We therefore requested an internal review of the decision to refuse our request. The response acknowledged the failure to provide advice and assistance which enabled us to rephrase our request which was made on  26 May 2022.  As no response had been received by July, we contacted the Information Commissioners Office who wrote to the Council on 25 July 2022 asking them to respond with 10 working days.   We received two responses during August 2022.  The responses helped us to understand the background behind how the decision was arrived at.

Incorrect assumptions

The responses to our Freedom of Information Request confirmed that only three sites were ever considered:-

  • The cemetery (ruled out owing to the public outcry)
  • Hall Place
  • Ayscoughfee Gardens

We were told that the focus had been on Hall Place was because we had requested this in our October 2019 Newsletter, and they even had the cheek to supply us with a copy! It is a pity that they had not read it properly as it made no reference to Hall Place:-

What our Chair actually wrote

It is also pleasing to hear of an increasing desire to restore the Johnson Memorial Drinking Fountain to the town centre. The ongoing campaign to reduce plastic waste makes this something that we must surely set out to achieve next year. There’s a blueprint right on our doorstep in Sleaford, where the restored Bristol Drinking Fountain was unveiled a year ago, a project driven by Sleaford Civic Society and largely funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund. Whilst we don’t know how much it would cost to bring the Johnson Fountain back into the town centre, I’m tempted to say, if Sleaford can do it, why can’t we?

So, the reason why the Fountain is once again, in Ayscoughfee Gardens was down to at least five failures by the Council:-

Failure 1

The failure to treat the Society as an equal partner and work with us to look at all possible options that could then be put out to the public for their views.

Failure 2

The failure to take on board the recommendations of the Heritage sub-group of the Town Centre Regeneration Steering Group.

Failure 3

To read our Newsletters properly and to make assumptions.

Failure 4

To properly consult and engage with the public about where it should go

Failure 5

To listen and to hear.

Further Planning Application

The council resubmitted its planning application on 19 July 2022. Whilst we did object to it, planning applications can only be refused if there is a legitimate planning reason to refuse it. The planning committee could only consider the proposal that was put before them.

We tried and it was clear that the planning committee were divided, with many expressing their unease about the application before them but because the recommendation by the planning officers was to approve it, it was approved. In doing so members of the planning committee acknowledged that there had been a failure in public engagement and consultation. It was described as “poor planning” and is was disappointing that all possible options had not been explored in detail.

Is the future of the Fountain Settled

For now it is, but two wrongs  do not make a right. In time we hope that the conditions will exist where it can be returned to the town centre in a suitable location that has public support as a working drinking fountain. A project driven by the residents of the town.  It has happened elsewhere as the following examples supplied to the Council in 2021 proves:- 

  • Sleaford Civic Society received a grant of £34,000 in 2019 from the Heritage Lottery Fund to bring the Bristol Water Fountain built in 1874 back into use.
  • North Walsham Town Council restored a drinking water fountain installed to mark the Coronation of King George V bringing it back into use in 2020. 
  • Bristol brought the Castle Park drinking fountain back into use in 2019.
  • Bishop Auckland The Castle Chare fountain erected in 1873 was brought back into use in 2020 funded jointly by Durham County Council & Historic England
  • St Pancras Station A Victorian Drinking fountain installed in the 1870’s to tackle cholera was restored to working order in 2018.
  • Nailsworth Pupils at the Acorn School worked with the district council to bring a historic drinking water fountain back to working order as part of a plastic free project.

These were just a few of the many examples we found at the time. We also provided the Council with suggestions for funding and support and offered to work with the Council to secure the restoration of the Johnson Drinking Fountain in Spalding Town centre in full working order and that offer remains on the table should any future Council serving Spalding have the will to put right the wrongs of the past.

We as a Society will not rest easy until the Johnson Drinking Fountain is treated with the respect that that it deserves. To acknowledge the contribution of Miss Mary Johnson that enabled fresh mains water to be provided to many parts of the town.